Day 28 (2/14): Intro to Ecocriticism

-

Warm Up:
SSR

Learning Intentions:
  • Critical Lenses can offer an interpretive frame for understanding literature.
  • Ecocriticism is concerned with the ways that humans interact with and conceptualize nature.
Success Criteria
  • Students make claims about textual meaning based on the theories of Ecocriticism.
  • Students ground these claims in interpretation of specific textual evidence.
  • Students share their ideas & findings both within a small group and with the class.
Agenda:
Homework:
  • Read TS/IS, Ch. 2 - 3 takeaways
  • Finish Resume and Submit
  • Come dressed nice for Interview Day!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Day 53 (3/28): Intro to The Things They Carried

-
Image
Warm Up: Voice Lessons: Diction Lesson #6 Learning Intentions: We are learning that... Effective rhetorical analysis works to explain how a text works to convey its meaning. Authors use rhetorical strategies to add power, nuance, and depth to their arguments. Success Criteria We will know we have been successful when we can... Name the elements that are essential to every effective argument. Identify, name, and explain a selection of rhetorical devices and strategies. Agenda Activity: Meme the Rhetorical Device Intro to The Things They Carried Upcoming: For Tuesday (I will not be here): Finish  and submit Focus Project Product #1 Planning Guide. Be sure to include: Complete and specific description of Exigence, Audience, Purpose and Form Some idea of a plan for completion 4 standards that your product will demonstrate mastery of A bibliography with at least 6 sources in MLA format Continue reading The Things They Carried . (Ch. 1-4 Quiz and Discussion Thursday) Finish Vocabulary Meme A
Read more

Day 23 (2/7): Inductive & Deductive Reasoning

-
Image
Warm Up: POP Quiz: Induction & Deduction Learning Intentions: Successful arguments are nuanced, complex, and carefully reasoned. Argumentative Structures exist that can aid in organizing a meaningful argument. Success Criteria Identify instances of inductive and deductive reasoning, and consider their strengths and weaknesses as techniques for authentic arguments. Explain organizational structures for developing arguments. Develop a nuanced thesis based on a topic that matters. Agenda: Intro To Argumentation Inductive & Deductive Reasoning Logical Fallacies Mini-lesson: Finessing a Thesis Statement Practice: Thesis Statement Homework: Read Everything's An Argument, Ch. 7 Draft Review: Unfounded Claims, Faulty Reasoning Reread your "Unknown" Argument. Look for (and highlight) any sentences that seem to make assumptions that are either unfounded, or might require further justification. In the margins, explain the faulty reasoning.
Read more

Day 24 (2/8): Developing Claims from Evidence

-
Image
Warm Up: Revised Thesis Share-out Learning Intentions: Strong thesis statements act as nuanced guides to the argument you are making. Using evidence effectively means examining it in depth and considering how it out to shape your argument. Success Criteria Develop a revised thesis statement based on a prompt Perform a "1 on 10" and a "10 on 1" with argumentative evidence based on a prompt. Agenda: Mini-Lesson: Developing Evidence Activity: 10-on-1 and 1-on-10 Argumentative Structures Toulmin Argument: Identifying Warrants Homework:
Read more